Amid increasing concern for patient safety and the shutdown of prominent research operations, the need to improve protections for individuals who volunteer to participate in research has become critical. “Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs” considers the possible impact of creating an accreditation system to raise the performance of local protection mechanisms. In the United States, the system for human research participant protections has centered on the Institutional Review Board (IRB); however, this report envisions a broader system with multiple functional elements. In this context, two draft sets of accreditation standards are reviewed (authored by Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research and the National Committee for Quality Assurance) for their specific content in core areas, as well as their objectivity and validity as measurement tools. The recommendations in the report support the concept of accreditation as a quality improvement strategy, suggesting that the model should be initially pursued through pilot testing of the proposed accreditation programs.
Medicine
[PDF] Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Subjects, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine, Institute of Medicine
$19.99

![[PDF] Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Subjects, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine, Institute of Medicine](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/1b86bf2082929593b6cfddb07fb2c1a8-d.jpg)
![[PDF] Observations on the President's Fiscal Year 2002 Federal Science and Technology Budget Committee on the Federal Science and Technology Budget, Engineering, and Public Policy Committee on Science, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/90a573ea2fe1121afbbd0ea6febefe36-d.jpg)
![[PDF] Initial Guidance for an Update of the National Vaccine Plan: A Letter Report to the National Vaccine Program Office Committee on the Review of Priorities in the National Vaccine Plan, Institute of Medicine](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/1f2c64632df721369b594e97e25221d1-d.jpg)
![[PDF] Assessing the Effects of the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill on Human Health: A Summary of the June 2010 Workshop Institute of Medicine](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/23a2bd9b1ca80096114a432c7ce891c4-d.jpg)
![[PDF] Advanced Research Instrumentation and Facilities Committee on Advanced Research Instrumentation, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/5446b952ed0cb76ebbeaf823fe2609e2-d.jpg)
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.