Amid increasing concern for patient safety and the shutdown of prominent research operations, the need to improve protections for individuals who volunteer to participate in research has become critical. “Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs” considers the possible impact of creating an accreditation system to raise the performance of local protection mechanisms. In the United States, the system for human research participant protections has centered on the Institutional Review Board (IRB); however, this report envisions a broader system with multiple functional elements. In this context, two draft sets of accreditation standards are reviewed (authored by Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research and the National Committee for Quality Assurance) for their specific content in core areas, as well as their objectivity and validity as measurement tools. The recommendations in the report support the concept of accreditation as a quality improvement strategy, suggesting that the model should be initially pursued through pilot testing of the proposed accreditation programs.
Medicine
[PDF] Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Subjects, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine, Institute of Medicine
$19.99

![[PDF] Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Protection Programs Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Subjects, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine, Institute of Medicine](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/1b86bf2082929593b6cfddb07fb2c1a8-d.jpg)
![[PDF] Observations on the President's Fiscal Year 2002 Federal Science and Technology Budget Committee on the Federal Science and Technology Budget, Engineering, and Public Policy Committee on Science, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/90a573ea2fe1121afbbd0ea6febefe36-d.jpg)
![[PDF] Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security Controls at the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories Committee on Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/1cfcfb78e170b00f00cc6d9fbabd3e6b-d.jpg)
![[PDF] Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads Committee on Underrepresented Groups and the Expansion of the Science and Engineering Workforce Pipeline, Engineering, and Public Policy Committee on Science, Policy and Global Affairs, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ac9a96ac97de7427f2198307b58fc816-d.jpg)
![[PDF] Mammography and Beyond: Developing Technologies for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer Committee on Technologies for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer, National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine, Division of Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/28d17349fb18e531663ab6ce4fa9c3a4-d.jpg)
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.