During public health emergencies such as pandemic influenza outbreaks or terrorist attacks, effective vaccines, drugs, diagnostics, and other medical countermeasures are essential to protecting national security and the public’s well-being. The Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE)–a partnership among federal, state, and local governments; industry; and academia–is at the forefront of the effort to develop and manufacture these countermeasures. However, despite the PHEMCE’s many successes, there are still serious challenges to overcome. Government-funded medical research is not always focused on countermeasures for the most serious potential threats, and it is difficult to engage pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to develop and manufacture medical countermeasures that have a limited commercial market. At the request of the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, the IOM held a workshop February 22-24, 2010, to address challenges facing the PHEMCE. Workshop participants discussed federal policies and procedures affecting the research, development, and approval of medical countermeasures and explored opportunities to improve the process and protect Americans’ safety and health.
Medicine
[PDF] The Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise: Innovative Strategies to Enhance Products from Discovery Through Approval: Workshop Summary Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Catastrophic Events, Development, and Translation Forum on Drug Discovery, Institute of Medicine
$19.99

![[PDF] The Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise: Innovative Strategies to Enhance Products from Discovery Through Approval: Workshop Summary Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Catastrophic Events, Development, and Translation Forum on Drug Discovery, Institute of Medicine](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/dcb64371b219582c5c19593e8e290925-d.jpg)
![[PDF] Science and Technology in the National Interest (Compass Series) Engineering, and Public Policy Committee on Science, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/add0323e5ccf397f49a7b122207565b4-d.jpg)
![[PDF] Observations on the President's Fiscal Year 2002 Federal Science and Technology Budget Committee on the Federal Science and Technology Budget, Engineering, and Public Policy Committee on Science, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/90a573ea2fe1121afbbd0ea6febefe36-d.jpg)
![[PDF] Initial Guidance for an Update of the National Vaccine Plan: A Letter Report to the National Vaccine Program Office Committee on the Review of Priorities in the National Vaccine Plan, Institute of Medicine](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/1f2c64632df721369b594e97e25221d1-d.jpg)
![[PDF] Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security Controls at the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories Committee on Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine](https://digzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/1cfcfb78e170b00f00cc6d9fbabd3e6b-d.jpg)
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.